| O2 Broadband help This is a discussion on, Are these Stats better? within the O2 Broadband help and support forum; Are the Stats listed in blue below better than the one listed in red? Uptime: 0 days, 0:07:07 DSL Type: ... |
![]() |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are these Stats better?
Are the Stats listed in blue below better than the one listed in red?
Uptime: 0 days, 0:07:07 DSL Type: G.992.5 annex A Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 922 / 3,280 Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [kB/kB]: 0.00 / 0.00 Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12.0 / 19.0 Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 16.5 / 32.5 SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 6.5 / 22.5 Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / BDCM Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 28 / 0 Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 42 / 0 Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0 Loss of Link (Remote): 0 Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 83 / 0 FEC Errors (Up/Down): 32 / 29 CRC Errors (Up/Down): 32 / 0 HEC Errors (Up/Down): 9,015,494 / 0 Link Information Uptime: 0 days, 23:01:48 DSL Type: G.992.5 annex A Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 1,325 / 8,188 Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [kB/kB]: 0.00 / 0.00 Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12.0 / 19.0 Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 16.0 / 31.0 SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 6.0 / 8.5 Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / BDCM Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0 Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0 Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0 Loss of Link (Remote): 0 Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 0 / 0 FEC Errors (Up/Down): 543 / 146,061 CRC Errors (Up/Down): 543 / 2 HEC Errors (Up/Down): 10,156,775 / 1 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are these Stats better?
Yes, much better.
In the first set you had a very significant noise problem, or at least, the signs of one as your router had an extremely high downstream noise margin to compensate. The high noise margin meant a low sync speed. In the second set all looks much better but there is still some evidence of a noise problem. Presumably you've made some changes between the two sets. If you tell us what you've done then we can advise further. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are these Stats better?
Hi Zee
I agree with Saturday on your stats. I think you're on the standard package if I'm right but practically you can achieve more on your line with 31 db attenuation ( approx 13-14 meg). If you're interested in higher download speeds then perhaps you can think of upgrading to a higher package and enjoy additional benefits. Iqbal |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are these Stats better?
There was a call restricting socket (not sure what its called) that the previous owner had left on one of the sockets (not the master!). I didnt have a key for it but decided to remove it. After taking a screwdriver and a chisel and lots of patience I managed to remove it. I am hoping its helped but I was starting to see an improvement before I removed it. I have attached a pic of the socket.
I am thinking of getting an o2 box III from Ebay so that my wireless signal will improve. Would I be able to use it without having to mess about with configurations? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are these Stats better?
Quote:
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32 AM.







Linear Mode
